论文部分内容阅读
本文基于进入模式理论和制度理论,以2002年至2011年中国知识产权局专利许可备案数据中筛选出的跨国公司对中国企业进行专利许可合同为样本,检验了直接投资、投资动机对跨国公司在国际技术许可中使用排他性策略的影响,以及母国与东道国间规制距离的调节作用。研究结果显示:进行了直接投资的跨国公司有更高的排他性许可的可能性;相对于混合动机跨国公司,市场寻求型跨国公司采用排他性许可的可能性更低;当母国与东道国之间的规制距离大时,相对于没有进行直接投资的跨国公司,在东道国进行了直接投资的跨国公司采取排他性许可的可能性更高,反之亦然;当母国与东道国之间的规制距离大时,相对于混合动机跨国公司,效率寻求型跨国公司采用排他性许可的可能性更低,反之亦然。
Based on the theory of access models and institutional theory, this paper uses the patent licensing contract of Chinese companies selected by the Chinese Intellectual Property Office’s patent license filing data from 2002 to 2011 as a sample to test the direct investment and investment motivation of multinational companies. The impact of the use of exclusive strategies in international technology licensing and the regulatory role of regulatory distances between home countries and host countries. The results of the study show that multinational corporations with direct investment have a higher possibility of exclusive licenses; compared with mixed motive multinational corporations, market-seeking multinational corporations are less likely to use exclusive licenses; when there is a regulation between home countries and host countries When it is large, compared with multinational companies that have not invested directly, multinational companies that have made direct investments in host countries are more likely to adopt exclusive licenses, and vice versa; when the regulatory distance between the home country and the host country is large, relative to Mixed-motivated multinational corporations are less likely to use exclusive licenses for efficiency-seeking MNCs, and vice versa.