大革命失败后,茅盾从国内政治活动中悄然退出,思想和情绪陷入矛盾之中。他开始用创作整理和反思大革命的经验,在发表了表明态度的《从牯岭到东京》之后不久,却激起革命文学派作家的激烈批判。茅盾随后展开回击,从而构成“革命文学”论争的重要内容。本文首先对茅盾在大革命失败后的庐山行迹做出考证,进而剖析茅盾在这一关键时期的思想变化,辨析其与革命文学派在“现实”观方面的论争。 After the failure of the Great Revolution, Mao Dun quitted quietly from domestic political activities, and thought and emotions fell into conflicts. He began to use the experience of creating and reflecting on the Great Revolution, but shortly after he published his attitude of “From Guling to Tokyo”, he provoked intense criticism from the writers of revolutionary literary schools. Mao Dun then launched a counter-attack, which constitutes an important part of the “revolutionary literature” debate. This article first makes a research on Mao Lushan’s track of Lushan Mountain after the failure of the Great Revolution, and then analyzes Mao Dun’s ideological changes in this crucial period and analyzes its controversy with the revolutionary literature school in the view of “reality ”.