论文部分内容阅读
在首届中钢书法艺术节即将来临之际,特别是其中的第十一届中国钢笔书法大赛、首届中国毛笔与硬笔书法大展暨“双十杰双百优”评选备受瞩目,大赛能否做到公正的评审成为关键。由此,我们约请了郑可春先生就如何构建创新的书法评审机制写篇文章。郑先生文中论述的评委“隔行不隔山”评审、单独评审,做到“零交流”“无干扰”、作品获奖,非作者获奖、组织与评审分离、现场直播,即时公布评审结果等策略非常有创新意义,不仅对硬笔书法比赛的评审有益,对毛笔书法赛事的评审也非常有指导意义。为此,我们将本文提到的策略举措提请首届中钢书法艺术节组织委员会和评审委员会进行讨论,吸纳其积极的因素,以期形成科学的评审机制,指导首届中钢书法艺术节的评审工作。同时,我们开门办赛,也欢迎广大读者和有识之士就此问题展开讨论,形成文字邮寄到杂志社来,择优吸纳并发表。
At the very beginning of the first China Steel Calligraphy Festival, especially the 11th Chinese Pen Calligraphy Contest, the first Chinese calligraphy brush and hard pen calligraphy exhibition and “Double Ten Excellent” Whether or not a fair review can be a key issue. As a result, we invited Mr. Cheng Ke Chun to write an essay on how to construct an innovative calligraphy review mechanism. The judges’ comments on the article “interlacing without mountains” review, a separate review, so that “zero exchange ” “no interference ”, works award, non-author award, separation of organization and review, live broadcast, immediate release The strategies such as the assessment results are very innovative. They are not only beneficial to the judging of the hard pen calligraphy competition but also to the assessment of the brush calligraphy competition. To this end, we propose the strategic measures mentioned in this article to the first China Steel Calligraphy Festival Organizing Committee and the review committee to discuss and absorb its positive factors, in order to form a scientific review mechanism to guide the first review of the work of the Calligonomic Arts Festival. At the same time, we open the door to run the game, but also welcome readers and people of insight on this issue to discuss the formation of text mail to the magazine, choose and absorb and publish.