论文部分内容阅读
目前,学校评价学生学习质量的主要依据是考试成绩。例如,某次综合性检测中,某学生语文、物理、化学的卷面成绩分列是80分、70分、90分,据此得出该生的薄弱学科是物理的结论,显然有失公允。因为,一方面语文学科的满分值也许是120分,而物理、化学满分值是100分;另一方面,或许与物理题目偏难有关,而化学的平均成绩在90分以上。若再次进行化学学科检测,该学生卷面成绩为75分,也不能
At present, the main basis for schools to evaluate students’ learning quality is the test scores. For example, in a comprehensive test, the scores of a student’s language, physics, and chemistry are separated into 80 points, 70 points, and 90 points. From this, it is concluded that the weak subject of the student is a physical conclusion. It is obviously unfair. . Because, on the one hand, the full score of the Chinese subject may be 120 points, and the physical and chemical full score is 100 points. On the other hand, it may be related to the difficulty of the physical subject, and the average score of chemistry is more than 90 points. If the chemical subject is tested again, the student has a score of 75 points.