经常读“中学生论坛”的读者可能有这么个感觉:这个栏目偏爱那些指摘时弊的杂文、思想评论、社会评论什么的,甚至还有文艺评论,却很少登我们广大中学生最需要的一般议论文。经常有读者来信反映那些杂文选得都不错,读来也非常过瘾,可读完就忘,待到自己下笔写议论文时往往还是老样子,提高不大。为此,这一期我们专门为大家准备了两篇中规中矩的议论文:《善待顺境,挑战逆境》和《是金子,就总会发光》。前一篇以“摆事实”为主,结构不复杂,说理的线索非常清楚,语言也很老到,可谓“立论”型议论文的典范之作。虽然出自高中生之手,但值得广大初中朋友学习。后一篇“讲道理”的功夫很高。时于“是金子,总会发光”这个平时大家熟悉到几乎可以忽略的论题,小作者七挖八挖,竟然生发出不少议论,尤其是他懂得用辫证唯物主义的观点分析问题,值得广大高中朋友借鉴。最后一篇《征文大赛下的阴影》,则保持了我们栏目一贯的锋芒与锐气。 The readers who regularly read the “Student Forum” may feel this way: This column prefers the essays, ideological reviews, social commentaries, and even literary criticisms that criticize the shortcomings, but it rarely reads the general needs most of our middle school students need. Argumentative. There are often letters from readers reflecting that the essays were all well-chosen, and they were very enjoyable to read. When they read it, they forgot. When they wrote their dissertation, they often remained the same and they did not improve. For this reason, in this issue, we prepared two plausible argumentative papers for everyone: “Treat Your Own Environment, Challenge Adversity,” and “Is Gold Always Glowing.” The previous article focused on “facts,” and the structure was not complicated. The clues of reasoning were very clear, and the language was also very old. It could be described as a model work of “argumentation”. Although from the hands of high school students, it is worth learning from junior high school friends. The “rear reasoning” in the next article is very high. When “” is gold, it always glows. “This is a topic that everyone is familiar with almost negligible. When the young author digs and digs, he even makes a lot of comments, especially if he knows how to analyze the problem from the standpoint of materialism. It is worth learning from the high school friends. The last ”Shadow under the Essay Contest" maintained the sharpness and sharpness of our columns.