论文部分内容阅读
语言哲学两大流派分析哲学和现象学解释学,尽管都强调语言研究的重要性,但是两者研究的视角和方法截然不同。前者提出分析命题意义的哲学观念,后者着重于对人的历史性的理解。当分析哲学由罗素时代走向维特根斯坦时代,日常语言学派的语言分析就与现象学解释学理论的普适性一起共同为语言学习提供了诠释的空间。在此意义下,理解活在语言中的人与语言所构成的语言学习就包含在社会历史、社会时间和社会空间的有意义的解释语境中。
Although the two major schools of linguistic philosophy analyze philosophy and phenomenological hermeneutics, they emphasize the importance of linguistic research, but the perspectives and methods of the two studies are quite different. The former proposed the philosophical idea of analyzing propositional meanings, while the latter focused on the historical understanding of human beings. When the analytic philosophy moved from Russell’s era to Wittgenstein’s time, the linguistic analysis of the everyday linguistic school together with the universality of the phenomenological hermeneutics theory provided a space for interpretation of language learning. In this sense, understanding the language learning of the people and languages living in the language is involved in the context of meaningful interpretation of social history, social time, and social space.