教学改革刚开始时,我还是用资产阶级观点来对待的.不但没有从党的教育方针的重大意义上去认识体会,相反地却认为可能是功课多,教材深,学生跟不上,暂时采取这种减轻负担的权宜之计.因之,只是被动地单纯从方法上考虑,在课堂搞点形式主义的改革.同时,思想上也存在不少问题,如:历史课有不符合党的教育方针的地方吗?又不考试,又减轻负担,能提高质量吗?学生不下“十年寒窗”的功夫,能获得知识吗?高三毕业后考大学文科怎么办?总之,想法颇多,矛盾重重,自己也想不开. At the very beginning of the teaching reform, I still treated it with the viewpoint of the bourgeoisie. Not only did I not realize my understanding from the great significance of the party’s education policy, but on the contrary I thought it might be that there was more homework, more textbooks, and students could not keep up. As a result, it is only a passive method of thinking in the classroom to engage in formalist reforms. At the same time, there are many ideological problems, such as: historical lesson does not meet the party’s education policy Do not take exams, but also reduce the burden, can improve the quality? Students can not “ten years Hanchuan ” effort, can get knowledge? After graduating from high school entrance examination liberal arts how to do? In short, a lot of ideas, contradictions Heavy, I can not think of it.