论文部分内容阅读
上海的洪辰明和兰州的王飞鹏先后寄来有关角镜成像的稿件,分别对今年初中版第7期《角镜成像的实验研究》提出质疑,洪文得出定性结论.但未做定量分折或给出通用公式;王文对可能的情况作了详尽的论述.但也来做定量分析.且分类过繁、成像原理有误.没有得出正确结论.针对以上情况.我对角镜成像问题进行了深入的探索,整理成下文.
Shanghai’s Hong Chenming and Lanzhou’s Wang Feipeng have sent manuscripts related to angular gonio imaging. They challenged the experimental study of angular imaging in the 7th issue of this year’s edition. Hong Wen has reached a qualitative conclusion, but has not made a quantitative analysis. Or give a general formula; Wang Wen made a detailed discussion of the possible circumstances, but also to do quantitative analysis. And the classification is too complicated, the imaging principle is wrong. Did not draw a correct conclusion. For the above situation. I angular imaging The problem was explored in depth and organized into the following.