不难看到,随着现今对师德的重视越来越凸显,不少地方也在很多涉及教师切身利益的诸多考评事项上加大了“师德”在其中的分量,乃至在各类荣誉评选甚至是一些业务性称号或成果的选拔中,实施了没有“师德优秀”便“一票否决”的制度。然而同时也不能不看到的是,在高举起“师德”大旗之时,一些地方和学校的师德考核办法其实出现了“一条腿长一条腿短”的现状,并非十分科学、严谨和全面, Not difficult to see, with the present emphasis on the ethics of teachers is more and more prominent, many local teachers are also involved in many of the vital interests of a number of evaluation items on the “teacher” in which the weight, and even in all types Honor selection or even some of the business titles or the selection of results, the implementation of the system without “moral excellence ” “one-vote veto ” system. However, at the same time, we can not but see that at the time of holding high the banner of “teacher’s morality,” some teachers and schools in some localities and schools actually adopted the “one leg and one leg short” status quo, not Very scientific, rigorous and comprehensive,