论文部分内容阅读
近年来,求异思维常见诸报端杂志,一时成了研究的热门。其意无非是:不拘常规,寻求变异,从多方面探求问题的答案和方法,得出异乎寻常的独特见解。这些特征,即美国心理学家吉尔福特所说的思维的多端性、变通性和独特性等三大特征。如果恰当地运用这种求异思维,确实可以开拓学生思路,甚至会导致创新,这是应当重视的。然而过分夸大其作用则是有害的。现在有的文章认为求同思维是一种习惯性思维,在课堂上,我们总是把学生的思路纳入教师预定的思维路线,最后找到一个统一的答案”,是一种非创造性思维。这种观点是不符合实际的。
In recent years, different thinking often newspapers, became a research hot. His intention is nothing more than: unconventional, seeking variation, from many aspects of the answers to questions and methods, come to exotic unique insights. These three characteristics are the multifaceted, adaptable and unique characteristics of thinking as American psychologist Gilford said. If proper use of such divergent thinking can really broaden students' thinking and even lead to innovation, it should be taken seriously. However, exaggerating its role is harmful. Some articles now think that seeking common ground thinking is a kind of habitual thinking. In class, we always include the students' thinking in the teacher's predetermined thinking line and finally find a unified answer. "This is a kind of non-creative thinking. Opinion is not realistic.