笔者从几所小学开高的语、数实验班的成绩来看,确实很好,同对比的普通班相比较,往往有「天壤之别」。究其原因,除了实验教材本身的因素之外,还有两点:一是实验班和教师都是学校领导几经考虑挑选的素质好、经验丰富的教师,二是实验班的学生是经过认真选择的学生。选择好教师搞实验,无可非议。但是,实验班的学生搞择优组合,我认为就有点「虚」和「偏」了。 每每听完实验班的一堂课,在评课时或评课后,总会听以这样一些议论,这个班的学生挑选的好,那个班的学生挑选的不好。似乎实 From a few primary schools to open high words, the number of experimental class results, really good, compared with the contrast of the ordinary classes, there is often a “big difference.” The reason, in addition to the experimental teaching material itself, there are two points: First, the experimental classes and teachers are selected by the school leaders to consider the selection of good quality and experienced teachers, and second, experimental class students are carefully selected s student. Choose a good teacher to experiment, beyond reproach. However, the students in the experimental class engaged in preferential selection and I think it was a bit “virtual” and “partial”. Often after listening to a class of experimental classes, during or after class, always listen to some of the discussion, the students in this class picked well, the students in that class to pick well. Seems real