自上世纪末以来,由于立法上的不甚明晰,学理和实务上对于知识产权侵权赔偿责任是否以过错为构成要件众说纷纭,从而造成了知识产权审判标准和司法保护的不一致。学者和法官对于知识产权侵权赔偿是以无过错责任、过错责任还是过错推定责任为一般归责原则各执一端,直接影响到对过错应否作为知识产权侵权赔偿责任构成要件的认识,因为,以过错责任或过错推定责任为归责原则的侵权赔偿责任,必然要求以过错为构 Since the end of the last century, due to unclear legislation, lack of clear understanding of whether intellectual property infringement liability for intellectual property infringement on the intellectual property infringement constitute elements of controversy, which led to inconsistencies in the criteria for the trial of intellectual property and judicial protection. Scholars and judges on the principle of no fault of fault, fault of fault or fault of presumption of fault as the general principle of attribution of liability for infringement of intellectual property directly affects whether the fault should be recognized as a component of liability for intellectual property infringement, because Fault liability or fault presumption of liability for the principle of liability for tort liability, will inevitably require fault to structure