论文部分内容阅读
作为选拔性考试的高考,让每个学生都能考出自己的水平,应是一项基本的要求。遗憾的是多年来高考作文命题较少从学生角度考虑,这就使不少考生的作文不能充分反映其写作能力与水平,自然也就不能完满地达到选拔的目的。要让每个考生都能考出自己的写作水平,命题必须使考生都能无误地明白题目的要求。以往的高考作文考试中,总有一些学生因“跑题”而严重失分。例如,有把“玫瑰与小姑娘的故事”(94年考题材料)理解为“应该重视教育后代”的,有把“尝试”(94年考题)理解为“品尝”、“经历”的,有把“鸟的对话”(95年考题)理解为批评“好高骛远”、“鼠目寸光”、“虚有其表”、“人云亦云”等等的;有的由于缺乏漫画知识,而把两幅漫画(96年考题材料)仅看作描绘外科手术事故的,有的则
As a college entrance examination for a selective examination, it is a basic requirement for each student to be able to test his/her own level. It is a pity that over the years the college entrance examination essay proposition is less considered from the perspective of students, which makes many candidates’ compositions can not fully reflect their writing ability and level, and naturally cannot achieve the purpose of selection. For each candidate to be able to test his or her own writing skills, the proposition must enable the candidate to understand the requirements of the title without fail. In previous college entrance exams, there were always some students who had lost points because of “dating.” For example, the story of “Rose and the Little Girl” (94 exam question materials) is understood as “should pay attention to the education of future generations”, and “try” (94 exam) is understood as “taste” and “experience”. The “Bird’s Dialogue” (95-year exam) was interpreted as a criticism of “goodness and ignorance”, “sightlessness”, “excessiveness”, and “cloudiness” and so on; and some comics (96 exam questions) due to lack of comics knowledge. ) only as a description of surgical accidents, while others