论文部分内容阅读
目的:研究对比开胸手术与胸腔镜下手术治疗原发性肺癌的临床疗效。方法:将2011年12月~2013年12月期间所收治的80例原发性肺癌病例纳入本次研究,根据随机数字表法将其均分为对照组与观察组各40例,对照组采取传统开胸手术治疗,观察组则实施胸腔镜手术治疗,观察两组治疗情况,并对研究结果相关数据作统计学处理。结果:与对照组相比,观察组切口长度更短、术中出血量更少、引流时间和住院时间更短,并发症发生率更低,组间差异显著而具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:在原发性肺癌临床治疗方案中,胸腔镜手术治疗效果确切,术创较小,有利于患者恢复,同时较少不良反应,值得予以推广使用。
Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy of thoracic surgery and thoracoscopic surgery in the treatment of primary lung cancer. Methods: 80 cases of primary lung cancer admitted from December 2011 to December 2013 were included in this study. According to the random number table method, 40 cases were divided into control group and observation group. The control group Traditional thoracotomy, the observation group was performed thoracoscopic surgery, the treatment of two groups were observed, and the results of the data for statistical analysis. Results: Compared with the control group, the incision length of the observation group was shorter, the blood loss was less, the drainage time and hospitalization time were shorter, the complication rate was lower, the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P <0.05 ). Conclusion: In the primary clinical treatment of lung cancer, thoracoscopic surgery has the exact effect and minimally invasive surgery, which is beneficial to the recovery of patients with fewer adverse reactions and worth to be promoted.