同一篇科技论文文稿送不同的专家评审,有时意见是不一致的。产生意见分歧的原因何在?对此,选择了有代表性的审稿案例进行分析,认为专家的学识水平、审稿态度、审稿的侧重点和学术观点等的不同,是产生意见分歧的重要原因。文章对所选案例给出了处理办法,提出编辑人员应科学合理地利用审稿专家的意见,充分发挥学术期刊编委会的作用,在编辑工作中发挥主动性,使评审意见有分歧但又有一定创新价值的论文也有发表的机会,提高学术期刊的学术水平。 The same technical papers sent to different expert review, and sometimes the views are inconsistent. What is the reason for the disagreement? In this regard, I chose a representative case study for analysis, that expert differences in the level of knowledge, attitude, peer review and academic point of view is the importance of disagreement the reason. The article gives some solutions to the selected cases, proposing that editorial staff should utilize the opinions of reviewers scientifically and reasonably, give full play to the role of editorial board of academic journals, give full play to their initiative in editorial work, Papers with some innovative value also have the opportunity to publish academic standards to improve the academic level.