论文部分内容阅读
当下中国宪法学界对社会权的研究日渐升温,但令人遗憾的是,与社会权相关的种种问题却仍然有待厘清。社会权是区别于传统自由权,为了促进与维护社会公平,追求实质平等而要求国家有所作为,积极保障人民的生活水平的一种积极权利形态;社会权恰似一个权利束,涵盖范围相当广泛,几乎涉及到公民生活的方方面面;社会权可被进一步区分为“一般社会权条款”与“具体社会权条款”。我国应以通过宪法修正案的方式逐步将社会权相关内容纳入宪法文本,并针对“一般社会权条款”与“具体社会权条款”的不同类型分别设定不同的权利保障或救济模式。当然,上述探讨的前提即在于宪法应当并且能够在司法审判过程中被援引。
Nowadays, the study of social rights in China’s constitutional jurisprudence is on the rise. However, it is regrettable that the problems related to social rights still need to be clarified. Social rights are different from the traditional right to freedom, in order to promote and maintain social fairness, the pursuit of substantive equality and require the state to make a difference, and actively safeguard the living standards of the people a positive form of power; social rights just like a bundle of rights, covering a very wide range , Covering almost all aspects of civic life; social rights can be further divided into “general social rights provisions” and “specific social rights provisions.” China should gradually incorporate the relevant contents of social rights into the constitutional text by means of amending the constitution and set different rights protection or remedies for different types of “general social rights clause ” and “specific social rights ” mode. Of course, the premise of the above discussion lies in that the Constitution should and can be invoked during the judicial trial.