目的　了解电脑验光的准确性 ,探讨电脑验光能否替代传统的验光技术在招飞体检中的应用。　方法　通过对 6 5 7例 1314眼正常视力男青年的小瞳孔电脑验光、散瞳后电脑验光和散瞳后人工检影验光检查 ,对比其符合率 ;并进行了三种不同方法验光招飞淘汰情况的比较。　结果　两种不同方法散瞳后验光与小瞳孔电脑验光的结果存在着很大差异 ,两种不同方法电脑验光的招飞淘汰率较检影验光的淘汰率明显增高 ,小瞳孔电脑验光的结果尤为明显。　结论　在招飞体检中电脑验光尚不能完全替代检影验光 ,否则 ,应首先修改招飞体检中屈光检查的标准。目前可有条件地在招飞体检中应用散瞳后电脑验光 Objective To understand the accuracy of computer optometry, and to discuss whether computer optometry can replace traditional optometric techniques in the recruitment of physical examination. Methods The complication rate was compared among the 577 eyes of 1,574 young men with normal vision by small pupil computer optometry, dilated pupil computer optometry and dilated pupillary manual retinoscopy. Three different methods were used to remove the optometry. Comparison of the situation. Results There were significant differences between the two methods of dilated retropulmonary refraction and small pupil computer optometry. The elimination rate of computer optometry by two different methods was significantly higher than that by retinoscopy. The results of small pupil computer optometry were especially high. obvious. Conclusion Computer optometry can not completely replace the retinoscopy optometry in the recruitment of physical examination, otherwise, should first modify the criteria for refractive examination in the physical examination. Can be applied conditionally to apply dilated pupil computer optometry in the recruitment of physical examination