论文部分内容阅读
非常高兴地向广大作者和读者推荐程鹏同志的文章与来信。此文并非尽善尽美,但它说理细致,批评中肯,而且与人为善,文风朴实,值得提倡。我们欢迎这样“持之有据,言之有理”的批评文章! 此文虽然不长,却提出了两个带有普遍意义的重要问题,即在“这些年来诗歌评论乃至整个文学评论中”严重存在的“两种不良倾向”:轻率否定“语法规范”;评论缺乏科学态度。结果导致语言污染、理论混乱,确实值得高度重视,应当吁请人们加以注意。我们由于审稿不细,工作疏忽,助长了这种不良倾向,深感愧疚,我们真诚感谢程鹏同志及广大读者与作者对《诗刊》的一贯关心爱护和支持!
I am very happy to recommend Comrade Cheng Peng articles and letters to the majority of authors and readers. This article is not perfect, but it is reasonable, criticism is fair, and people are good, simple style, it is worth promoting. We welcome such a critically acclaimed article as “well-founded and reasonable.” Although this article is not long, it presents two important issues of general significance, namely, “in these years the poetry commentary and even the entire literary commentary In the ”serious existence “ two undesirable tendencies ”: negligence “ grammar norms ”; comments lack of scientific attitude. As a result, language pollution and chaos in theory have indeed been given high priority. People should be urged to pay attention to them. We are deeply guilty of contributing to this unhealthy tendentiousness due to careful review and negligence of work. We sincerely thank Comrade Cheng Peng and readers and authors for their constant concern and support for the Poetry Magazine.