论文部分内容阅读
对(内地版)初中《几何》第一册(91年12月版本)与(人教版)初中《几何》第一册相应内容进行了对比,笔者认为两本教材在编写上有各自的特色。(人教版)《几何》课本的内容一般从定义、公理出发,经过演绎、推理,得出一系列定理、性质等,以后所学的定理又从以前学过的定理出发逐步推证得出,这种推理方式,知识系统严谨、完整,推理逻辑性强,论证有力严密,笔者在过去学习《几何》过程中及以后在教学工作中对这种严格推理、演绎的方式已很习惯了。因此,在粗略的翻阅了一遍(内地版)《几何》教材之后,似乎给人一种不太习惯的感觉,再认真与(人教版)
Comparing the corresponding contents of the first edition (December, 1991 edition) of Geometry (Primary Edition) and the first edition of Geometry (Primary Education Edition) of the (Chinese edition) junior middle school, the author believes that the two textbooks have their own characteristics in their writing. . (PEP) The content of textbook Geometry generally starts with definitions and axioms. After deduction and reasoning, a series of theorems and properties are obtained. The theorems learned in the future are gradually derived from the theorems that have been studied before. This kind of reasoning method is characterized by rigorous and complete knowledge systems, strong logic of reasoning, and strong argumentation. The author has been accustomed to such strict reasoning and deduction methods in his teaching work during and after the study of Geometry. Therefore, after a cursory review of the Geography textbooks (inland version), it seems to give people a feeling of being less accustomed to it.