论文部分内容阅读
从一起食品卫生处罚案件出发,展示其在行政诉讼过程中集中呈现的处罚对象、法律解释和证据规则三大法律争点。借助行政相对人理论,合理解释案件的处罚对象应是食品生产经营者,而非直接的食品生产经营人员;借助法律解释理论,反驳了机械的字面意思解释方法;利用法律位阶原理,说明了作为《食品卫生法》下位法的《浙江省实施〈中华人民共和国食品卫生法〉办法》在无细化上位法规定的情形下,不构成对《证据规则》的违反。
Starting from a case of food hygiene sanctions, this article will show the three legal issues of punishment object, legal explanation and evidence rules which are concentrated in the process of administrative litigation. With the help of administrative relative theory, the object of reasonable punishment should be food producers and operators rather than direct food producers and operators. With the help of legal interpretation theory, the legal literal interpretation of machinery is disproved. By using the principle of legal hierarchy, The “Measures for the Implementation of the Law of the People’s Republic of China on Food Sanitation” in Zhejiang Province as a subordinate law of the “Food Sanitation Law” does not constitute a breach of the “Evidence Rules” in the absence of the provisions of the subordinate legal system.