论文部分内容阅读
马克思的《1844年经济学——哲学手稿》(以下简称《手稿》,所引本书文字只注页数)是一部在世界上引起强烈反响和热烈争论的著作。关于劳动的思想,是《手稿》的重要内容。但在国内学术界,对于劳动思想和唯物史观的渊源关系尚投有专门的论著和较详尽的评析。本文拟通过对劳动思想的分析来评价《手稿》在唯物史观形成中的作用和地位。 劳动,以及作为劳动的现实形态的异化劳动,是《手稿》中的基本概念。这两个概念是联结经济学和哲学,人与社会的纽带。在《手稿》中,劳动和异化劳动对于历史的主体和客体有着双重不同的意义。
Marx's Economic-Philosophical Manuscripts 1844 (hereinafter referred to as the “manuscript”, quoted in the book text only note the number of pages) is a book that has aroused strong repercussions and heated arguments in the world. The idea of labor is an important part of Manuscripts. However, in domestic academia, there are still devoted articles and more detailed comments on the origin of the relationship between labor and materialism. This paper intends to evaluate the role and status of “manuscripts” in the formation of historical materialism through the analysis of labor thoughts. Labor, as well as alienated labor as the real form of labor, is the basic concept in Manuscripts. These two concepts are the link between economics and philosophy, people and society. In Manuscripts, labor and alienation work have different meanings to the subject and object of history.