论文部分内容阅读
对韩愈《论语笔解》(以下简称《笔解》)一书,自宋代起学者们即已展开争论。清《四库全书总目提要》(以下简称《提要》)对宋人之说加以综合之后,以为此书非宋人伪撰。胡玉缙《四库全书总目提要补正》、余嘉锡《四库提要辨证》皆同意此说。然而,现代研究韩愈者多无视以上目录学家的结论,不作具体考辨,仅取宋人一家之说而断之伪作。这实在难以取信于人。笔者以为此书既非伪作,又非韩愈原本,而是宋人对“韩愈《论
On the Han Yu ”The Analects of Confucius“ (hereinafter referred to as ”pen solution“) a book, since the Song Dynasty scholars have already debated. After the summary of Sikuquanshu Head (hereinafter referred to as ”Summary“) was integrated with the theory of the Song Dynasty, it was thought that this book was not a fake author of the Song Dynasty. Hu Yu Jin, ”Sikuquanshu headline correction“, Yu Jiaxi ”Siku digest syndrome“ are agree with this. However, Han Yu, a modern researcher, often disregards the conclusions of the above bibliographers and does not make any specific examination, taking only the fake works of the Song people. This is really hard to win the trust of people. I think this book is neither a fake, nor the original Han Yu, but the Song of ”Han Yu" theory