劳动力市场依然供大于求的当下,一些用人单位为实现其利益最大化之目的,与劳动者签订就业合同时,设置种种霸王条款限制、欺压劳动者,劳动者不服从或反悔之时,用人单位又以有约在先、签字生效为由予以拒绝。而下面案例告诉我们,霸王条款从来不具法律效力,劳动者可理直气壮地说“不”!霸王条款一:就业协议签订后,反悔应付违约金?【案例】毕业前夕,在校方与企业联合招聘活动期间,大四学生小丹与一家电讯 When the labor market is still oversupply, some employers, in order to maximize the benefits of their employment, sign employment contracts with employers, set restrictions on overlord terms, oppress laborers, and employers do not obey or regret it. Again with the precedence, to sign the entry into force to refuse. The following case tells us that the terms of the King never lawful, laborers confidently say “Boss ” one article: employment agreement signed, the regret to meet the liquidated damages? [Case] ​​graduation, the school and the business union During the recruitment activities, senior student Dan Dan and a telecommunications company