历代以来,各种人物站在不同的立场,对秦始皇“焚书坑儒”有着不同的看法和评议。对一个历史人物和事件,各个阶级站在不同的阶级立场,会得出截然不同的评价,这是毫不奇怪的。顽固地维护奴隶制的孔老二被劳动人民斥为“丧家之狗”、“四体不勤、五谷不分”的寄生虫;而地主资产阶级的反动统治者却对他顶礼膜拜,吹捧他为“圣人”,一直抬到吓人的高度。秦始皇是新兴地主阶级的杰出政治家,他第一个完成统一中国的伟大事业,建立了专制主义的中央集权的封建国家,在我国历史上起过重要的进步作用。但是,古今中外的反动派都反对秦始皇,对他进行咒骂和污蔑。 Since ancient times, all kinds of people stand in different positions and have different opinions and comments on Qin Shihuang’s “burning books, cramming Confucianism and Confucianism.” It is not surprising that a completely different assessment will be given to a historical figure and an event in which all classes stand on different class positions. The second man, who persistently maintained slavery, was denounced by the working people as the “dog of the bereaved family,” a “parasite of unsympathetic and grain-rich”; however, the reactionary rulers of the landlord-bourgeoisie worshiped and touted him As “saints”, has been lifted to a scary height. Emperor Qin Shihuang, an outstanding statesman of the emerging landlord class, completed the great undertaking of unifying China for the first time and established an authoritarian and centralized feudal country, which played an important and progressive role in the history of our country. However, the reactionaries at all times and in all countries opposed the Qin Shi Huang and cursed and slandered him.