论文部分内容阅读
以同行评议为基础的现有评审机制遴选非共识创新性项目往往低效,甚至可能具有负面意义,本文分析了其成因及后果,并提出相应的建议和对策。
Existing review mechanisms based on peer review tend to be inefficient and may even have negative implications for the selection of non-consensus innovative projects. This article analyzes its causes and consequences and makes recommendations and countermeasures.