论文部分内容阅读
提到《新唐书·地理志》(以下简称“新志”)的书写体例,人们往往赞誉不绝,大讲其优点,而很少讲甚至不讲其缺点.不仅曾公亮在《进新修唐书表》中自诩:“其事则增于前,其文则省于旧.……义类凡例,皆有据依”,王鸣盛在《十七史商榷》中多次称赞:“《新书》最佳者志表,列传次之,本纪最下”,“《新书》诸志表多能补《旧》之缺,而《新地志》尤远胜于《旧地志》.”连最近又对新、旧《唐书·地理志》作了仔细考辨和比较的人也一味称许说:“《新志》七卷,其精确详瞻,远胜《旧志》,所列州县变迁,言简意明.”他们即使对《新志》有所批评,也往往只限
When it comes to the writing style of “New Tang Dynasty Geographical Records” (hereinafter referred to as “Xin Zhi”), people often praise it for a long time and talk about its merits, but seldom say or even talk about its shortcomings. Revise the Tang book table, “self-诩:” The event increased by the first, the text is saved in the old ... ... Every kind of case, are based on “, Wang Ming-sheng in the” Seventeen History of the Argument “repeatedly praised:” “New Book ”The best of the best chronology, listed second, the most Ji Ji,“ ”New Book“ Zhushi table can make up for the ”old“, and ”New Chi“ far better than the ”old“. The people who carefully scrutinized and compared the new and old ”Tang Geographies“ blindly said: ”Seven volumes of the New Records are far more accurate than those of the old records, , Concise. “Even if they criticize the” New Chi "often limited