知识产权的各项权利在范围上均不同程度地存在着“模糊区”。在商标权中,也存在有关于类似商品和类似服务如何判断的“模糊区”。本文仅以笔者公司代理的“巴马格”商标行政诉讼案为例,尝试论证在司法实践中如何判定商品近似的问题,并就类似商品的判断标准进行探讨。案情2001年8月,杭州巴马格化纤有限公司(下称杭州巴马格公司)提出第1935604号 The various rights of intellectual property exist in different extents to “fuzzy area”. In trademark rights, there are also “ambiguities” about how to judge similar products and similar services. This article only takes the “Bamag ” trademark administrative litigation case which the author agency acts as an example to try to prove how to determine the approximate products in judicial practice and to discuss the judgment standards of similar products. Case August 2001, Hangzhou Bama Chemical Fiber Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to Hangzhou Bamag company) No. 1935604