论文部分内容阅读
行为人为了维护自己的所有权、债权或者损害赔偿请求权等一系列自救行为,其所采用威胁、要挟等超过必要限度的行为手段和外在表现,会与构成敲诈勒索罪的行为手段极为相似,此种情形应充分考虑其主观和手段的相当性。以行为人在法律上有取得对方财物的权利为前提,行为人在行使自己的权利范围之内,以行使权利为目的原则上是不成立敲诈勒索罪的,但不可否认的是行为人的手段行为仍然有可能构成其他侵害人身的犯罪。如果行为人利用主张权利的名义,试图实现非法获利的目的,则应构成敲诈勒索罪。
In order to safeguard their own ownership, claims or claims for damages and other series of self-help behavior, the threat of use, blackmail and other acts beyond the necessary limits of conduct and external performance, constitute an act of extortion is very similar to behavior, Such a situation should give full consideration to the subjectivity and the appropriateness of the means. To the perpetrator legally obtain the other party’s property rights as the premise, the perpetrator in the exercise of their own rights within the scope of the exercise of rights for the purpose of the principle is not set up extortion, but it is undeniable that the perpetrator’s behavior It is still possible to constitute other crimes against the person. If the perpetrator tries to realize the purpose of illegal profits in the name of asserting rights, it should constitute extortion.