论文部分内容阅读
建立完善的评价体系,真正实行优上劣下、竞争上岗的评审办法,大力提倡“五公开一监督”这一制约措施,有效地控制了人为因素的影响。通过公平竞争,使很多优秀中青年专业人才脱颖而出。 那么,在基层推荐过程中,是不是仅仅靠硬化条件打分,专家划圈就能得到预期结果呢?一个单位曾出现过这样一种情况:一位青年骨干,本人各方面条件均比较优秀,硬化条件打分时他排在10名的前几位。上面下达了4个副高职指标,本以为单位推荐是天经地义的事,可专家划圈时偏偏事与愿违,此人真的名落孙山了。本人和群众都大惑不解,甚至有的领导也
We will establish a sound evaluation system, truly implement the evaluation methods for superiority, inferiority, and competition for posts, and vigorously advocate the “five disclosures and one supervision” as a restrictive measure to effectively control the influence of human factors. Through fair competition, many outstanding young and middle-aged professionals have come to the fore. Then, in the grass-roots recommendation process, isn’t it just scoring on hardening conditions, and the experts can get the expected result after making a circle? A unit has seen such a situation: a young backbone member, who has excellent conditions in all aspects, hardening When conditions scored, he ranked in the top 10 players. The above has issued four sub-advanced vocational indicators. It is thought that the unit recommendation is a matter of right and proper sense. When experts circle the line, they are not doing what they wish. This person really falls behind Sun Shan. I am puzzled by the people and the masses, and even some leaders also