论文部分内容阅读
甲、案情经过:解县南营村中农张履忠,曾给乔家庄地主乔福宁寄存现洋三百元(给地主存白洋是不对的——编者)土改中,经群众追索,除已拿出四十元外,余据张称,已被该地主前后取用,但无确证,未经群众承认,亦未经该地主完全承认。结果,除去一百元群众不再追究外,余百六十元即以张之大车驴骡等财产,折价赠偿。事后,张上诉省府,控当时在乔家庄的土改工作员陈存栋迫其赔偿地主浮财,请予追还,并控陈贪污村中自行车一辆,应加法办。省府当令解县政府调查。陈存栋得悉后,认为张履忠控其贪污一节,全系诬告,因此申诉县府传张
After the case was passed, Zhang Lizhong, a middle-aged peasant in Nanying Village, Xie County, gave a deposit of 300 yuan to Qiao Fu-ning, the landlord of Qiaojiazhuang. In the course of land reform, Except for forty dollars, Yu said according to Zhang, it has been used by the landowner before and after. However, it has no corroborative evidence, has not been recognized by the masses and has not been fully recognized by the landlord. As a result, except for the one hundred yuan people no longer being held accountable, the other hundred and sixty yuan means the donkey mule and other property of Zhang’s trolley are discounted at a discount. Later, Zhang appealed to the provincial government to charge Chen Cun-dong, a land reform worker who was in Qiaojiazhuang at the time, for compensation for the landlord’s floating money. He said that he should repay the landowners and recover the bicycles in the corrupt village. Provincial government order investigation of the county government. After Chen Cun-dong learned that Zhang Lizhong accused Zhang Duanzhong of controlling corruption, the entire department falsely accused him of pleading the county