抽象的作品重点在方法论,有清晰的逻辑在里面,现在有大多介于抽象和具象之间的作品,存在有具象的形象却依赖抽象式的方法系统,我始终不大能理解千变万化的抽象的方法论,所以对这套东西始终也有一定的好奇,其中的一个好奇是:抽象究竟能把我们带到哪里?冷广敏不承认自己是抽象,确实他画里的形象太过清晰。可以说他用的是抽象画的方法,同时有一点波普的外壳,甚至还有点现成品的概念(虽然他根本没用现成品),也回避观念的或知识的矫情,总之画面简单易于辨识。我理解强调的还是从方法而来的绘画本身,在原创变得越来越不可能的今天,这种独立思考线索还是值得探究的。 Abstract works focus on methodologies, with clear logic in them, and now works mostly between abstraction and figurativeness. There is a figurative image but an abstract methodological system, and I have always been less able to understand the ever-changing abstractions Methodology, so there is always some curiosity about this set of things, one of the curiosities is: abstraction can bring us where? Leng Guangmin do not recognize himself as abstract, indeed, his image is too clear. It can be said that he used the method of abstract painting, at the same time a little Popper’s shell, and even the concept of ready-made products (though he did not use ready-mades), but also avoid the concept or the hypocritical knowledge, in short the picture is easy to identify . What I understand or emphasize is the drawing itself from the method, and it is worth exploring the independent thread of cults today as the original becomes more and more impossible.