在1966年的米兰达判决以前,美国联邦最高法院规范审前讯问的指导理论一直处于不断的发展变化之中。在米兰达案件中,最高法院最终将反对强迫自证其罪特权确立为规范审前讯问的主要根据,并导致特权自身发生变化。沃伦法院之后,米兰达判决的宪法地位一度有所动摇。2000年,美国联邦最高法院又重申了米兰达判决的宪法地位。 Before the 1966 Miranda verdict, the guiding principles of the Supreme Court of the United States in regulating pretrial interrogation have been constantly evolving. In Miranda’s case, the Supreme Court ultimately opposed objection to coercing self-incriminating privileges as the primary basis for regulating pre-trial interrogations and led to changes in the privileges themselves. After Warren Court, Miranda’s sentencing constitutional status was wavering. In 2000, the Supreme Court of the United States reaffirmed the constitutional status of Miranda’s judgment.