论文部分内容阅读
在近年的中国古玉研究中,将考古实物和文献记载相互对照,以探讨出土玉器的名称、功能及其文化内涵是一种通行的做法,而研究者最常引用的文献资料就是《周礼·考工记·玉人》中有关用玉制度的记载。但这种研究方法却忽视了非常重要的一点,即《考工记·玉人》中相关记载本身的可靠性,也就是说这些记载在多大程度上反映了周代的用玉制度。我们认为,要解决这个问题,仅依靠文献本身是不够的,还必须通过考古发现来加以佐证。本文就是借助相应的考古实物对《考工记·玉人》经文进行逐条考证,以期获知它
In recent years, the study of ancient Chinese jade, the archaeological physical and literature records in contrast with each other, to explore the unearthed jade name, function and cultural connotation is a common practice, and researchers most often cited references is “Zhou Li · Kaogongji · jade ”in the system of jade records. However, this method of research neglected the very important point that the reliability of the relevant records in “Kao Ke Ji Yu Man”, that is to say, to what extent these records reflect the system of jade in the Zhou dynasty. In our opinion, relying on the literature alone is not enough to solve this problem and must be supported by archaeological discoveries. This article is through the use of the corresponding archaeological objects on the “Kao Ke Ji Yu Man” textual research, in order to learn it