论文部分内容阅读
讀了吳晗同志的《并非爭論的“爭論”》(4月28日《光明日报》),有話继续要說,再写这篇《“历史知識”及其他》,仍然算是答复。在这里,我只着重談談引起爭論的主要問题——所謂“普及历史知識”、史实和虛构的关系,以及历史剧的艺术本质問題。沒有人否认文艺作品会給讀者带来各种各样的生活知識,文艺也不拒絕一切知識,我在《答吳晗同志》一文里就曾說过:“历史剧既然是反映历史生活題材的作品,它必須符合历史的真实性,而真实地描写生活,
Having read “not a controversial” controversy “by Comrade Wu Han (April 28, Guangming Daily), I must continue to say that writing this” historical knowledge “and others is still a response. Here, I will focus only on the major issues causing the debate - the so-called ”popularization of historical knowledge“, the relationship between historical facts and fiction, and the artistic nature of historical drama. No one denies that literary and artistic works will bring readers a variety of knowledge of life, nor will literary and artistic refusal of all knowledge. As I said in Commentary on Comrade Wu Han: ”Since historical drama is a work reflecting the theme of historical life, It must conform to the authenticity of history and truly describe life,