论文部分内容阅读
通常我们在研究刑法学的时候,经常会遇到两种危险接受的情况。第一种就是灾害的结果由被害人自己支配,在被告人的危险行为中,被害人参与其中;还有一种就是灾害的发生是由被告人行为支配着,是一种合意的行为。所以,在刑法学理论的研究过程中,规范的保护范围、被害人承诺或者被害人自我答责都不是危险接受理论的一部分。如果被害人参与到了危险事件中,则被害人行为支配灾害结果不属于使犯罪构成的要件。如果是在被害人意志的场合内,被告人支配者灾害结果的发生,不具备阻却犯罪事由,具有犯罪成立的可能。本文以试论刑法学中危险接受的法理为主题,展开了一系列较为深入的探讨与分析。
Usually when we study criminal law, we often encounter two kinds of dangerous situations. The first is that the result of the disaster is dominated by the victim himself, and the victim is involved in the dangerous behavior of the defendant. Another is that the occurrence of the disaster is governed by the defendant’s behavior and is a desirable act. Therefore, in the process of the study of criminal law theory, norms of the scope of protection, the victim’s commitment or the victim’s self-responsibility are not part of the theory of risk acceptance. If the victim is involved in a dangerous event, the result of the victim’s domination of the disaster is not an element of the crime. If it is in the will of the victim, the result of the disaster of the defendant’s dominance does not have the purpose of deterring the crime, and the crime may be established. In this paper, we try to discuss the dangerously accepted jurisprudence in criminal jurisprudence as a theme and carry out a series of more in-depth discussions and analyzes.