论文部分内容阅读
正確評定學生數學書面作業和口頭回答所具有教育的和實際的重大意義;是提高學生知識質量和學業成績的各種措施之一,並且對於學生畢業考試成绩的優劣也起着重要的作用。 關於學生書面作業和口頭回答的要求問題,在教育界和科學界有着不少值得注意的意見,這些意見表明,在數學書面解題的要求上存在着一系列的爭論,因而也涉及書面作業評定這一問題的爭論,讓我們把這些意見綜合起來研究一下,就不難看出它們的分歧是由於一方面對教育部各項關於學生數學書面作業評定標準原則的指示掌握得不够,只憑主觀和個人看法來理解和解釋這些指示;在另一方面,又沒有把正規的作業要求同個別人士對這個問題的見解和希望區別開來,學生書面作業正式要求和其評定
Correctly assess the educational and practical significance of students’ written work and verbal responses; it is one of various measures to improve students’ knowledge quality and academic performance, and it also plays an important role in the merits of students’ graduation test scores. Questions about the requirements of students’ written assignments and oral responses have a number of notable comments in the education community and the scientific community. These observations indicate that there is a series of disputes in the requirements for mathematically written problems and that this also involves written assignments. The controversy over this issue allows us to study these opinions together. It is not difficult to see that their disagreements are due to the fact that the Ministry of Education does not have enough instructions on the principles of the student’s mathematics written work evaluation standards. It is only subjective and personal. In order to understand and explain these directives, on the other hand, there is no distinction between formal job requirements and the opinions and hopes of individuals on this issue.