An Analysis on the Differences Between Adjectives and Determiners

来源 :校园英语·中旬 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:hlwerewolf
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
  【Abstract】An adjective is a word whose main syntactic role is to modify a noun or pronoun. A determiner is a noun modifier that expresses the reference of a noun phrase in the context. Thus, this research mainly analyzes the differences between adjectives and determiners from three aspects which are morphology, syntax and noun selection. It attempts to illustrate that the main differences based on determiners can not be subsumed within adjectives.
  【Key words】adjectives; determiners; differences
  1. Introduction
  In grammar, an adjective is a word whose main syntactic role is to modify a noun or pronoun, giving more information about the noun or pronoun’s referent. Adjectives belong to lexical categories because the words belonging to these categories have descriptive content (Radford, 1997). In English, adjectives are a set of open-class items. The number of this category is infinite and new adjectives can be created continually. A determiner is a noun modifier that expresses the reference of a noun phrase in the context, including quantity, rather than attributes expressed by adjectives. Determiners belong to functional categories. Function words serve primarily to carry information about the grammatical properties of expressions within the sentence. Most of the determiners belong to the closed-class. The number is limited and the members exclude each other.
  Determiners are positioned in front of nouns and adjectives can similarly be positioned prenominally. But we can not subsume determiners within the category of adjectives since there are many differences between determiners and adjectives. Determiners do not have the properties adjectives should have. This paper is going to illustrate how determiners are different from adjectives and thus why determiners can not be subsumed within the category of adjectives. Their differences lie in morphology, syntax and their selection of the nouns or noun phrases they modify.
  2. Morphological Differences
  Adjectives and determiners have distinct morphological properties. Adjectives have comparative and superlative forms while determiners do not have these two forms except many, much, little and few. For example, adjectives generally have a comparative form in –er (if they are not more than two syllables in length), whereas determiners do not. Adjectives as quicker, nicer and happier are well-formed and they form new members in the adjective class. However, determiners with suffixes –er, such as thiser, everier do not exist.   Moreover, adjectives generally have adverbial counterparts ending in –ly, such as quickly, nicely, happily. The negative prefixes un and in can be attached to adjectives to form a corresponding negative adjective (such as happy/unhappy) whereas determiners do not have these properties.
  3. Syntactic Differences
  The morphological distinctions are not the only differences between determiners and adjectives. These differences are not sufficient to categorize determiners out of adjectives. Syntactically, Determiners and adjectives are distinct in a variety of ways.
  Firstly, adjectives and other modifiers of noun phrases can be omitted without destroying the structural integrity but determiners can not be omitted freely. This is because determiners have essential relation, i.e. structural relation with the noun phrases they modify and are the necessary modifiers of the noun phrases. Other modifiers, including adjectives, only have lexical meaning connections with nouns they modify. Descriptions on lexical meaning do not influence the basic structure of the sentence. Descriptions of thing’s types, properties or states are optional and dispensable. Determiners are necessary in order to give grammatical meaning to a singular noun but separate adjectives can not. For in stance, a/the/another chair are grammatical but comfortable chair can not stand on its own as a complete noun expression.
  The second syntactic distinction between determiners and adjectives lies in their distribution. One example is that, adjectives can be recursively stacked in front of the noun they modify, so we can go on putting more and more adjectives in front of a given noun, such as tall dark handsome men; whereas determiners can not be stacked in this way. Generally, there is only determiners of a given type premodifying a noun so the car is grammatical but a that car is ungrammatical.
  What’s more, determiners can be coordinated (i.e. joined together by and) with other determiners of the same type. Likewise, adjectives can be coordinated with other adjectives. However, determiners can not be coordinated with adjectives. For example, each and every member of the class (determiner determiner) and a thoughtful and considerate person (adjective adjective) are grammatical expressions. Expressions like silly and these ideas are not grammatical (Radford, 1997).
  Moreover, when determiners and adjectives are used together to modify a noun, any determiner modifying the noun has to precede any adjective(s) modifying the noun. For example, his good old days, but not good his old days or good old his days.   4. Differences in Noun Selection
  A more general property which differentiates determiners from adjectives is that their selections of nouns to modify are not the same. Determiners tend to be restricted to modifying nouns which have specific number or countability properties. For example, the determiner a modifies a singular count noun, much modifies a (singular) mass noun, several modifies a plural count noun, more modifies either a plural count noun or a (singular) mass noun. By contrast, typical adjectives like nice, big, comfortable, modern, etc. can generally be used to modify all three types of nominal. For example,
  (1) He needs a nice, big, comfortable, modern house.
  (2) He needs some nice, big, comfortable, modern houses.
  (3) He needs some nice, big, comfortable, modern furniture.
  After all, there is an obvious sense that adjectives have descriptive content but determiners do not.
  Another difference is that adjectives can generally only be used to modify a restricted class of nouns because of their semantic properties. For example, we can say a thoughtful person, but not a thoughtful fish/cat/problem. Restrictions such as those are known as Selection Restrictions, it means that an adjective like thoughtful can only “select” certain kinds of nouns to modify, e.g. a noun designating a rational entity, which seems to be unlinguistic in nature. By contrast, determiners seem to be semantically much more “neutral” or “transparent” in some sense as we see from [a/the/this] person/cat/fish/pan/problem.
  It is a striking fact that many determiners can not only be used to modify a following noun expression, but can also be used on their own without any following noun. In this second type of use, they are traditionally categorized as pronouns, for example,
  (4) All guests / All are welcome.
  In structures such as we/you students, the pronoun we/you function as determiners which take the noun students as their complement. It therefore seems natural to suppose that simple pronouns like we/you could be analyzed as determiners used without any noun complement. It seems plausible to say that in both uses, the relevant items have the categorical status of determiners (or quantifiers), and that they can be used either pronominally or pronominally (Radford, 2000).
  Although most determiners can be used both pronominally and pronominally, there are a few which can only be used pronominally: the, every. However, third person pronouns like he/she/it/they are typically used only pronominally—hence the ungrammaticality of expressions such as they boy in standard varieties of English.   5. Conclusion
  Determiners are a set of closed-class items whereas adjectives have infinite members. Determiners and adjectives do not only have morphological and syntactic distinctions they also differ in the selections of nouns they modify. Adjectives have different morphological properties from determiners. In general adjectives have comparative and superlative forms of–er and–est while determiners do not have. Morphological properties can not exclude determiners out of adjectives. Syntactic differences are necessary in this way. Adjectives describing types, qualities or states of things are dispensable for sentence structure and can be omitted. In noun selection, determiners tend to modify nouns which have specific accountability properties whereas adjectives can generally be used to modify a restricted class of nouns because of the semantic properties.
  From the above analyses, it can be seen that determiners are different from adjectives in variety of ways. It illustrates the main differences based on which determiners can not be subsumed within adjectives.
  References:
  [1]Radford,Andrew.(2000).Syntax:A Minimalist Introduction[M].Beijing:Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
  [2]Radford,Andrew.(2002).Syntactic Theory and the Structure of English:A minimalist approach[M].Beijing:Peking University Press.
  [3]宋洁(Song,Jie).漫谈英语限定词[J].中国科教创新导刊,2008(13):28.
  作者简介:刘静(1985-),女,河南周口人,助教,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为认知语言学。
其他文献
【摘要】情绪、情感很大程度上影响着学生的个体行为,本文通过分析、运用情感态度在英语教学中的作用,着重阐述对学生情感态度的培养。从心理学的角度分析、研究学生的现状,并通过学生内在的发展来提高英语课堂教学。并且把培养起来的情感态度作为课堂学习的纽带,激发学生的学习兴趣,创造轻松的学习氛围,最终提高学生的英语学习兴趣和效率。  【关键词】情感 情绪 培养 英语教学 纽带  现代社会人际关系的日益冷漠和许
【Abstract】Teachers’ language is one important part in college English teaching.Politeness is regarded as a powerful strategy in dealing with interpersonal interaction.Based on Lakoff’s Polite Model,Le
一、高职英语项目化教学的背景  高职教育是以培养生产、服务、管理等方面的应用型人才为目标,坚持实用为主、够用为度的方向。英语作为一门重要的高职院校必修课,长期被认为是一项孤立的公共基础课程,所教内容与实际岗位需要有一定差距。高职英语教学改革势在必行,而项目化教学则是高职公共英语课程教学改革的发展方向。  项目教学法是指师生通过共同实施一个完整的工作而进行的教学活动,强调“能力为本位。学生为主体”,
【摘要】针对初中英语学困生若干问题,本文试图从班级社会学视角对学困生的形成的原因进行分析,并在此基础上就如何转化学困生身份的问题提出个人意见。以班级社会学角度分析初中英语学困生,突破了以往大多数心理学层面的研究局限,也期许能起到抛砖引玉的作用,为其他学科同类问题的分析研究提供新的视角。  【关键词】初中英语 学困生 班级社会学  一、两个概念的界定  1.班级社会学  (1)何为班级社会学。美国社
【摘要】词汇因其基础性,一直是英语教、学的重难点。特别是进入中学,词汇量增加、词形复杂、词义丰富等词汇的变化使重复记忆等机械的英语词汇记忆策略越来越没有效率,这就要求教师指导学生使用新的、合适的词汇记忆策略以提高记忆效率、降低记忆难度、延长记忆时间。  【关键词】词汇记忆 以教导学 新式策略 提高效率  英语词汇包括音、形、义三大要素,是组织和理解语言的基础,在英语教、学中占据着重要的地位。另一方
【摘要】本文提出了教师的心理健康问题及其危害以及如何增进教师心理健康,以促进教师自身发展的对策。  【关键词】教师心理 心理健康 教育质量 对策  健康的心理能够使教师成为人际关系的艺术家,正确而合理地处理师生之间,教师与家长之间,教师与同事之间,教师与领导之间的关系,使教师本人生活在一个稳定和谐的人际关系中,有利于教师本人的身心健康,有利于教师教学与教育工作的顺利开展并取得良好的效果,有利于家长
【摘要】英语写作作为一项重要的交际手段已被广泛应用于各个领域。对于初中学生来说,英语写作是初中英语教学的一大重点,英语新课程标准也对初中生的英语写作能力提出了更高要求。然而对于现在农村的中学生来说,即使经过几年的英语学习,大部分学生的写作能力仍是差强人意。本文对农村初中英语写作教学的地位、存在的问题、原因等进行探讨,结合教学实践,探索出适合农村初中学生英语写作的有效方法——立足教材,搭建结构,以读
【摘要】本文以探究课堂教学提问的有效性为目标,分析了课堂提问有效性的两个层面,即有效的问题和有效的提问策略,并提出了精心预设问题内容和有效提问策略的具体做法,以探索英语课堂教学有效性的策略,提高课堂教学质量。  【关键词】课堂设问 有效性 策略  巴尔扎克曾说过:“打开一切科学的钥匙都毫无疑问是问号。”这与宋代朱熹的“读书无疑者,须教有疑;有疑者,却要无疑”一语不谋而合。课堂提问是课堂教学的重要组
一、七选五命题特点  1.选材:短文一般为280-300词左右的说明文或议论文,其中正文词数240左右,选项词数60左右。短文篇章结构常归纳为:提出问题——解决问题,一般不在首段首句设空。七选五文章选材多用说明文,没出现过记叙文。新课标全国卷从2008年开始以说明文考查七选五阅读,且多为指导类说明文,至今没有一篇记叙文,也没有议论文。  2.结构:这类文章大部分都有非常清晰的思路与逻辑,多呈现大标
【摘要】《日用家当》是非裔美国黑人女作家艾丽丝·沃克的短篇小说。国内外学者对小说中人物看法趋于一致:褒扬玛姬对文化传统的保护,谴责迪背叛本民族文化传统。本文针对文化传统的继承提出一些相异的看法,玛姬和迪都有局限,应该把迪对文化继承的重要性的的认识和玛姬传承本民族文化传统的技能结合起来,在日常生活中继承和发扬黑人传统文化。  【关键词】黑人传统文化 文化继承  美国当代非裔女作家艾丽丝·沃克在美国文