论文部分内容阅读
文单国为万象说 ,在国内学界几成定论 ,然而该说却值得商榷。从欢州至文单的方位与里程来看 ,万象说存在缺陷。另外 ,在万象未有文单时期的考古发现。另一说乌汶说同样令人生疑。笔者从文单国的方位和里程考证 ,认为文单国在约梭通观 ,如此则和中国文献、考古发现相吻合。文单国是高棉人的国家 ,其时泰老族虽已进入老挝 ,但不是掌权民族。
The text of a single country to Vientiane said that in the domestic academic community a certain conclusion, but the saying is debatable. From Huanzhou to Wen’s direction and mileage point of view, Vientiane said that there are flaws. In addition, there was no archeological discovery during the period of Wenxian. Another said Ubon Ratchathani is equally suspicious. The textual research on the location and mileage of the texts states that the textual state of the texts is similar to that of the Chinese literature and archeology. Monogamy is a Khmer country, although the Tai La people entered Laos at the time, but they were not in power.