论文部分内容阅读
2009年4月29日,济南宣布从2010年起,高中阶段学校招生用学生学业水平考试成绩取代原中考文化课考试成绩,高中阶段学校将根据初中学生综合素质评价结果录取新生。这一变化将改变原中考“一考定终身”的评价体系。一直以来,“唯分数论”、“唯升学率”的高考、中考制度备受诟病,改变“一考定终身”的评价体系呼声不断。然而,济南此举一出,虽不乏鼓掌之人,但却没有获得预料中的普遍欢迎,反而遭到多方质疑。有人认为,考试制度隐藏着合理的公平性,特别是对一些家庭经济条件相对不好的孩子来说,虽然也有一些交学费上的难堪,但只要有一个好的分数,就会有均等的机会。也有人认为,中考可以取消,但济南的取代措施显得简单、粗糙。比如将要进行的学业水平考试,谁来评,怎么评,其中有多少人为的东西、模棱两可的东西,都还是个未知数。用个人观点去评价学生,会有多少合理性、公平性,更是一个不容回避的问题。
On April 29, 2009, Jinan announced that since 2010, the high school enrollment will replace the previous exam achievement with the academic level test of senior high school students. The high school will enroll freshmen according to the comprehensive qualifications of middle school students. This change will change the original examination “a test for life ” evaluation system. All along, the “only fractional theory”, “only” the college entrance examination, the entrance examination system has been criticized, changing “a test for life ” evaluation system constantly. However, the move of Jinan, although there is no lack of applause, but did not get the expected popularity, but was widely questioned. Some people think that the examination system hides a reasonable fairness, especially for some children whose families have relatively poor economic conditions, although there are some students who are embarrassed to pay the tuition fees, there is an equal opportunity as long as there is a good score . Some people think that the exam can be canceled, but the replacement of Jinan appears simple and rough. For example, the academic level to be conducted examinations, who to comment, how to comment, how many artificial things, ambiguous things, are still unknown. Evaluating students from a personal point of view, how much is reasonable and fair, is an unavoidable question.