论文部分内容阅读
在国际投资仲裁中,针对征收的公平市价补偿标准近年来逐渐扩张适用于非征收案件。根据国际法,投资条约未规定补偿标准的非征收案件,应适用习惯国际法上的完全补偿标准。因此,在非征收案件中是否适用公平市价标准,应视个案情况而定。在企业持续盈利、损失无法评估或非征收行为产生与征收相似后果等情况下,可以考虑适用该标准;而在非征收行为日之后投资价值增加、非征收行为发生时资产已贬值等情况下,则不应当适用该标准。总之,在国际投资争端解决和在投资协定谈判中,应谨慎对待这种扩张适用。
In international investment arbitration, the compensation rates for fair market levies have gradually expanded in recent years to apply to non-expropriated cases. Under international law, non-expropriation cases where the investment treaty does not provide for compensation standards should apply the full compensation standard in customary international law. Therefore, whether fair market rates apply in non-expropriation cases should depend on the circumstances of the case. In the case of continuous profitability and loss of the enterprise or similar consequences of the non-collection and acquisition, the standard may be considered for application. When the investment value increases after the non-collection action day and the assets have been depreciated when the non-collection activity occurs, Then the standard should not apply. In short, this expansion should be applied with caution in the settlement of international investment disputes and in negotiations on investment agreements.