论文部分内容阅读
目的构建与评估工作负担-应对资本职业紧张测量工具。方法共纳入1 618名电子制造服务业员工作为调查样本。采用知情同意自填问卷进行数据收集。提出工作负担-应对资本理论,并以其为基础构建职业紧张测量工具。引入探索性因子分析、结构方程模型等方法对模型数据进行拟合、优化和评估。结果单因素相关分析显示,各维度及条目间均有明显相关关系。内部一致性Chronbachα结果显示,量表各维度及子条目系数为0.750~0.929,总体α系数为0.788。探索性因子分析生成6个公因子,可解释65.9%的方差变异。结构方程模型拟合优度指数分别为CMIN/DF=6.16,AGFI=0.955,NNFI=0.970,IFI=0.980,RMSEA=0.057;且测量模型的路径均具有较高载荷。工具对性别、年龄、婚姻状况、教育水平及岗位等具有良好的区分效度。结论职业紧张工作负担-应对资本评估量表具有较为良好的科学性和逻辑性,可为职业紧张更深入的研究提供支持。
Objective To Construct and Assess the Workload - A Tool to Measure Occupational Stress in Capital. Methods A total of 1 618 electronic manufacturing service workers were included in the survey sample. Self-informed questionnaires were used for data collection. Put forward the working burden - coping with the capital theory, and construct the occupational stress measurement tool based on it. Introducing exploratory factor analysis and structural equation model to fit, optimize and evaluate the model data. Results One-way correlation analysis showed that there was a significant correlation between each dimension and item. Internal consistency Chronbach’α results showed that the scale of each scale and sub-item coefficient of 0.750 ~ 0.929, the overall α coefficient of 0.788. Exploratory factor analysis yielded six common factors, accounting for 65.9% variance variance. The goodness of fit index of structural equation model were CMIN / DF = 6.16, AGFI = 0.955, NNFI = 0.970, IFI = 0.980, RMSEA = 0.057, respectively. The tool has good discriminative validity on the basis of gender, age, marital status, educational level and post. Conclusion Occupational Stress Workload - Coping with the Capital Rating Scale has a fairly good scientific and logical support for further research on occupational stress.