论文部分内容阅读
目的分析以社区妇女保健为基础的外来女劳务工心理保健模式的效果,为社区心理卫生工作提供参考。方法对干预社区实施以社区妇女保健为基础的外来女劳务工心理保健模式,对照社区实施传统的社区心理保健模式;干预一年后,对不同模式的效果进行分析。结果干预后,干预社区的外来女性劳务工主观心理异常率为18.4%、SCL-90的总得分为(137.89±34.33)分,均显著低于对照社区的21.4%及(148.83±39.48)分,也低于干预社区干预前的23.7%及(162.41±43.15)分;主动采取心理保健措施率为56.3%,则显著高于对照社区的47.0%,也高于干预社区干预前的43.7%。结论以社区妇女保健为基础的外来女劳务工心理保健模式比传统的社区心理保健模式具有良好的效果。
Objective To analyze the effect of mental health care model of migrant women workers on the basis of community health care and provide reference for community mental health work. Methods The mental health care model of migrant women workers based on community health care was implemented in the intervention communities, and the traditional community mental health care model was compared with that of the community. After one year of intervention, the effects of different modes were analyzed. Results After intervention, the abnormal rate of subjective psychology of migrant women workers interfered with the community was 18.4%, and the total score of SCL-90 was (137.89 ± 34.33) points, which were significantly lower than that of the control community (21.4% and 148.83 ± 39.48) But also lower than 23.7% and (162.41 ± 43.15) points before intervening community intervention. The rate of proactive psychological health measures was 56.3%, which was significantly higher than 47.0% of the control community and 43.7% before intervention community intervention. Conclusion The psychosocial care model of migrant women workers based on community health care has a better effect than the traditional psychosocial care model.