论文部分内容阅读
本文从语用学的角度对新闻话语的交际意义进行了阐释。语用合作原则和关联原则对话语意义推理作出了不同的解释,但是二者都暗示了交际者在意义推理中的理性行为,即话语意义的理解过程是符合逻辑规则的。话语意义的理解可以看做是在新闻语言交际语境中对交际者说话意向的还原。新闻话语意义的推理可以看做新闻交际者对信念协调性的自我辩护。基于此,作者提出如下假设:在正常新闻交际语境中,我们倾向于相信一个陈述,而不是拒绝它,即使这个陈述可能是错误的,因为证明一个陈述是错误的要付出更多的认知努力。我们只有在确定这个陈述是错误的时候才拒绝它。
This article explains the communicative meaning of news discourse from the perspective of pragmatics. The principles of pragmatic cooperation and the principle of relevance make different interpretations of the meaning of discourse, but both imply that the communicators’ rational behavior in meaning reasoning, that is, the process of understanding discourse complies with the rules of logic. The understanding of discourse meaning can be seen as the reduction of the intention of speaking to the communicator in the context of news language communication. The reasoning of the news discourse meaning can be regarded as the self-defense of the news communicator on the coordination of belief. Based on this, the author posits the hypothesis that in the context of normal news communication, we tend to believe a statement rather than reject it, even though the statement may be wrong because it is wrong to prove that a statement is worth paying more Work hard. We reject it only when it is determined that the statement is wrong.