目前大学文科的教学方法存在许多缺点,需要改革。最主要的缺点是过分强调课堂教学,学生上课记笔记、考试背笔记。学生在课后也读一点教科书和参考书,但总的说来,读书甚少。用这种方法培养出来的学生,往往出现所谓“高分低能”的现象。笔记背得很熟的学生可得高分,但他们掌握的知识不多,缺乏独立思考和分析问题、解决问题的能力。对这种教学方法许多人都不满意,连有些学生也不满意。我们系里前两年评奖学金,把几位考试成绩最好的学生评为奖学金获得者,引起了一些学生的不满。现在对教学方法要求改革的人越来越多了。但是对怎样改法还有不同意见。我想根据过去几十年的经验,对文科教学方法的改革问题谈一些看法。不当之处请大家指正。 At present, liberal arts teaching methods have many shortcomings and need reform. The main disadvantage is that too much emphasis on classroom teaching, students taking notes in class, exam back notes. Students also read a few textbooks and reference books after class, but generally speaking, they rarely read books. Students trained in this way, often appear so-called “low score ” phenomenon. Students with well-documented notes can score well, but they have little knowledge of them and lack the ability to think and analyze problems independently and problem-solving. Many people are not satisfied with this teaching method, and some students are not satisfied either. In our department two years before the scholarship, several students with the best test scores were awarded as scholarship recipients, causing dissatisfaction among some students. More and more people are now demanding reforms in their teaching methods. However, there are different opinions on how to reform the law. I would like to share some views on the reform of liberal arts teaching methods based on the experiences of the past few decades. Please correct me wrong.