论文部分内容阅读
作为刑法因果关系领域的通说理论,条件说受到了条件说无用论、条件说错误论以及条件说宽松论的批评,但这些批评意见都难以成立。是否有助于查明因果关系,并不是评价包括条件说在内的刑法因果关系理论的合理标准。条件公式的确会在假定因果关系和择一因果关系的场合得出错误结论,但条件公式不等于条件说判断公式,而条件说判断公式可以在上述两种场合得出正确结论。条件说可以区分为积极条件说和消极条件说,积极条件说的确存在过于宽松的问题,但目前在理论上占据通说地位的消极条件说并不存在这个问题。
As a theory of causality in criminal law, the theory of conditions is said to have been criticized by the doctrine of useless conditions, the doctrine of false conditions and the doctrine of conditional easing, but these criticisms are difficult to set up. It is not a reasonable standard to evaluate the theory of causation of criminal law, including the conditions, whether it helps to find causality. The conditional formula does indeed give false conclusions on the assumption of a causal relationship and a causal relationship, but the conditional formula does not equal the conditional statement formula, whereas the conditional statement formula can lead to the correct conclusion on both occasions. Conditions that can be divided into positive conditions and negative conditions that the positive conditions that there is indeed too loose the issue, but now occupy the dominant position in the negative conditions that do not exist this problem.