一就这个戏的题材,我们有什么好说的?说到底,这场情杀难道不是发于原始的冲动、难道不是形而下的勾当?能讲出什么花活儿?是啊,至于吗?后世有文人挑《奥赛罗》毛病,往往出于这种“至于吗”心理。观众、演员、评论家常常问:奥赛罗怎么就相信了谗言?伊阿古为什么要陷害奥赛罗?莎士比亚似乎语焉不详。伊阿古吐露作案动机,读着像作者为他找借口。维多利亚文人嘲笑称,此乃一方手帕的悲剧。对这轻浮的诘难,斯托尔和楚金两位戏剧教授反唇相讥:真讲 In the end, this love is not made in the original impulse, is not the metaphysical activities? What flowers can be spoken? Yes, as it? Later generations of literati Pick “Othello” problems, often out of this “as? ” Psychology. Audiences, actors, and critics often ask: How did Othello believe the rhetoric? Why did Iagol be fraught with Othello? Shakespeare seemed to be absent. Iago teaches his motives and reads as if the author made excuses for him. Victoria scholar laughed at, this is a handkerchief tragedy. To this frivolous embarrassment, Stall and Chu King two dramatic professors retorted: True