论文部分内容阅读
其实在中国社会建立市场经济，那挺进的速度还是蛮快的，跟俄罗斯比比就知道了。正因为进展快，碰到的麻烦冲突就显得密集，好象特别多，好象市场经济唯独在中国水土不服，好象英国工业革命是一路迈着绅士步踱过来的——真正严肃的、客观的历史主义立场恐怕不好随便附和这种那种意气之见吧。 我们在众多来稿中挑选出两种对抗性强的见解，希望第一，让一些读者朋友解气；第二，让另一些读者朋友冷静；然后可心平气和。市场经济与文化的关系确实是一个深刻的问题，正因为深刻，人们的思辨往往很难跟上情绪。 我们不能冷静清晰地辨析各种关系，以及各个概念，请问什么阻碍了我们？是知识，还是思辨力？这本身是不是也泄露出什么“文化”的踪迹？
In fact, the establishment of a market economy in Chinese society, that the speed of advance is quite fast, with Russia Bibi will know. It is precisely because of the rapid progress that the conflicts and troubles encountered are intensive and appear to be particularly numerous. It seems that market economy alone is not acclimatized in China. It seems that the Industrial Revolution in Great Britain has walked all the way through gentlemen’s steps - really serious, Inevitably, the objective historicist position can not be reconciled to this kind of opinion. We have chosen two competing ideas among many contributions, hoping that the first will be for some readers and friends to solve their problems; second, for some readers and friends to calm down; and then you can calm down. The relationship between market economy and culture is indeed a profound issue. Precisely because of the profound, it is often difficult for people’s speculation to keep up with their emotions. We can not calmly and clearly identify the various relationships, as well as the various concepts, what will hinder us? Is knowledge, or speculation? Is this in itself also reveal what “culture” trail?