一般地说,研究者将自己的研究成果提供给社会和公众,总要先通过学术期刊编辑这个关口.因为相对于其他学术传播媒介来说,学术期刊对学术成果的传播,兼具了敏捷性与系统性两个特点;研究者要想较快地和比较系统地推出自己的成果,首先的考虑总是学术期刊这个传播媒介.而研究者的成果是否具有向社会和公众介绍的价值,也就是说值不值得,有没有必要占用一定版面在学术期刊上发表,学术期刊编辑往往具有裁判的身份和作用.在这里,具有决定性意义 Generally, researchers provide their own research results to the public and the general public at first, through editing the academic journals first, because academic journals have the agility to disseminate academic achievements relative to other academic media And the systematic nature of the two characteristics of the researcher in order to quickly and more systematically to launch their own results, the first consideration is always the academic journal of this media, and whether the researchers have the results to the community and the public to introduce the value of In other words, it is not worth it, there is no need to occupy a certain forum published in academic journals, academic journals often have the referee’s identity and role. Here, of decisive significance