二、“金融资本论”中的错误希法亭的著作,虽然对于马克思主义经济理论有重要的发展,但也难免于理论的错误,由于这种错误,使他不能够理解资本主义帝国主义阶段的整个本质。希法亭只说明了新资本主义的部分现象,并不曾把帝国主义的基本的和全体的东西加以分析。我认为希法亭错误的起点,在于他的分析在本质上不是从唯物论,而是从观念论的错误的基本观念出发的。马克思对资本主义的分析,始终一贯地建立在唯物论的基础上; Second, the “financial capital” in the mistakes Hifa Ting’s writings, although for Marxist economic theory has important developments, but also unavoidable theoretical error, because of this error, so he can not understand the stage of capitalist imperialism The whole nature of Hilferding only illustrated some phenomena of the new capitalism and did not analyze the basic and the totality of the imperialists. I think the starting point for Hilferding’s mistake is that his analysis is essentially not based on materialism but on the basic erroneous concept of conceptualism. Marx’s analysis of capitalism has always been based on materialism;