近一年多来,各地按照中央抓大放小的政策指示精神,对部分国有小企业,特别是县、区属国有企业及乡镇企业产权制度进行了力度较大的改革,引起各界关注,产生了一些不同的看法和争论。有的同志以为抓大放小就是搞私有化显然,这种观点是不正确的从多年来国有小企业,特别是县办、区办国有小企业以及部分乡镇企业的经营实践看,一个突出的问题是政企不分,产权不清,责权不明,无人负责。结果导致亏损日益严重,债务负担持续上升,国有资产大量流失,令人痛心。搞得好的县、区国有小企业为数很少。不少国有小企业连续十几年、甚至二十几年亏损,巨额补贴成为县、 Over the past year or so, in accordance with the Central Government’s policy of focusing on the large and small, the local governments have carried out major reforms in the property rights system of some state-owned small enterprises, especially state-owned and county-owned enterprises and township and village enterprises in the counties, districts, and districts, which have aroused concern from all walks of life. Some different opinions and arguments. Some comrades think that privatization is the most obvious aspect of privatization. This view is incorrect. From the management practice of state-owned small enterprises, especially county-level offices, district-owned small-sized enterprises, and some township and village enterprises over the years, there is an outstanding one. The problem is that there is no separation between government and enterprises, unclear property rights, unclear responsibilities, and no responsibility. As a result, losses have become increasingly serious, the debt burden has continued to rise, and a large number of state-owned assets have been lost. It is heartbreaking. There are few state-owned and small state-owned small enterprises that have done a good job. Many state-owned small enterprises have suffered losses for more than ten years or even twenty years in a row, and huge subsidies have become counties and counties.